Divorce needs no introduction. Regardless of where you are in the divorce process, the most beneficial thing you can do is to understand your options, learn more about how the system works, and know the possible outcomes.
Our job is to make your divorce less stressful. We ensure our clients are always informed throughout the process. We encourage and facilitate settlement and negotiations outside of the courtroom, but when that is not possible, we get results in the courtroom.
Before the divorce process officially begins is the best time to meet with an attorney to learn about your options and the process. Knowledge is power and knowing what to do before you start a divorce can make the process easier. If you are the one asking for a divorce, you should make sure you are ready before you start. But keep in mind, just because you are exploring the idea of a divorce, does not mean you have made up your mind. It is not like jumping off a cliff; you can take small steps until you know if it is the right decision for you. The beginning of a divorce is reversible. If you discover along the way that you would like to reconcile with your spouse, you should try. You can stop the process any time before the court signs the final decree. This is the time to explore your options and to make sure divorce is right for you.
Questions to think about in the Decision stage:
Every Maricopa County divorce requires standard documentation to start the legal process. A Petition for Dissolution must be filed with the court and whomever filed the Petition must legally serve the opposing party. During the divorce proceedings the person who filed for the divorce is referred to as the “Petitioner” and the person who responds to the divorce is referred to as the “Respondent”.
The court does not favor either party in the divorce. It does not matter if you file for the divorce or if you respond. Arizona is a no-fault state, which means that a person does not need a reason for seeking a divorce. Terms Petitioner and Respondent are only used to differentiate between the two people involved.
Serving the Divorce Petition – In an Arizona divorce, once a Petition has been filed, a copy of the Petition and the related documents must then be legally served on the other spouse. Service can be accomplished in a few different ways, including by waiver, by personal service, or by process server. The date of service is important, because it is the date the “marital community” is deemed separated.
End of the Marital Community – From the date of service going forward, the parties will no longer accumulate “community” property or debt; that is, property that each spouse has a claim to and debts that each party is deemed equally responsible for.
Preliminary Injunction will be served along with the Petition. This stops both parties from selling community property, making changes to existing insurance coverage, and removing minor children from the state without court permission or the other parent’s written consent.
“Cooling-off” Period – Once a Petition for Dissolution has been filed and served to the opposing party, the mandatory 60-day “cooling off” period begins. This means that the soonest you can be officially divorced is 60 days from the date of service.
Response to a Petition for Divorce – In an Arizona divorce, the responding spouse has 20 days after service to file a Response to the Petition of Dissolution served within Arizona; he or she has 30 days to respond if served outside of Arizona.
*If No Response to the Petition is Filed – If the responding spouse fails to file a Response within the allowed time, the petitioning spouse may apply for a default judgment. A spouse applies for a default judgment by filing an Application and Affidavit for Default. The responding spouse will then have 10 days to respond to the Application and Affidavit for Default. If the spouse fails to respond, a Default Decree of Dissolution of Marriage may be obtained, which grants the divorce on the terms of the spouse who originally filed the Petition.
*If Both Parties Agree to All Issues – In an Arizona divorce, if a Response is filed and the parties are able to agree on all issues, a Consent Decree of Dissolution of Marriage setting forth all the agreements can be submitted to the court.
Divorces in Arizona follow a similar path. The primary court events are outlined below:
Resolution Management Conference (RMC) – The court typically schedules an RMC to get acquainted with the case. This takes place in court (virtual or in-person) and is attended by both parties and their attorneys.
Rule 69 Agreement – At the RMC, the court will try to determine if there are already any agreements and if so, the court may have those agreements recorded as a formal and binding agreement, known as a Rule 69 Agreement. The court will also review the status and decide if there are any, services and/or orders the parties need to help conclude the matter. Those services and/or orders could include drug testing of one or both parents, mental health evaluations, vocational evaluations, and business evaluations.
Parenting Conference – If parenting issues are disputed, the Court may Order that the parties attend a parenting conference or a family assessment. Some parenting disputes may require a court appointed advisor for children.
Settlement Conference – Next, the Court will generally schedule a settlement conference with the court’s alternative dispute resolution (ADR) services. A settlement conference involves the help of a neutral mediator who attempts to help the parties resolve the remaining issues without going to trial.
Trial – Last, the court will set a trial date to hear any disputed issues; if the parties are able to settle all issues before the trial date, they can notify the Court to cancel or “vacate” the trial. If the matter does proceed to trial, the court will issue a divorce decree within 60 days of the trial.
In an Arizona divorce, your divorce decree will terminate your marriage and you will be officially divorced on the day the Court files your signed decree with the Clerk.
Depending on your circumstances, your decree may also determine child custody (known as legal decision-making and parenting time in Arizona), child support, spousal maintenance, property and debt division, responsibility for attorney fees, and changing back to prior name. If you have a minor child or children together, both parents must separately attend a court-mandated education program about the impact of divorce on children. This requirement must be completed before the court will grant a divorce involving minor children.
Getting a divorce with children follows the same process as a divorce, with a few extra steps. If you and your spouse can agree on how to share parenting time and make decisions regarding the children, the process can be smooth and short in duration. But Arizona’s laws, rules, and procedures can become complicated if you and your spouse have different ideas with how your children should be raised. It can become even more complex if child support is contested.
When a divorce involves minor children you need to consider the following:
Somewhat confusingly, the term “custody” does not exist in Arizona family law. The Arizona legislature changed this law in 2013 because of the common misconceptions and confusion surrounding the term. The important thing to remember about “custody” is that the two basic questions to be determined regarding children in a divorce are:
Parenting Time – When does each parent have the children in their care?
Legal Decision Making – Who makes major decisions (e.g. school, health, religion) about the children?
The Best Interest of a Child is a standard by which a court determines what arrangements would be to a child’s greatest benefit, often used in deciding decision-making and parenting time matters.
Legal Decision-Making refers to who makes ‘major decisions’ on behalf of the children. Major decisions include education, medical care and religion. The court can award Sole Legal Decision-making or Joint Legal Decision-making or some combination of the two.
Parenting Time refers to both custody and visitation. Parenting Time outlines where the children live and when they see each parent. Equal parenting time is when both parents have the children for the same amount of time. There are a variety of different parenting time schedules to satisfy these arrangements.
Child Support is a court-ordered payment paid by one parent to the other parent for the financial support of a child. The amount is calculated by Arizona’s Child Support Guidelines, which calculated in a Child Support Worksheet
In a Divorce, the Court is required assign to each party their share of the assets and liabilities.
The Court can and will assign to each party their share of the assets and liabilities. What the Court cannot do, however, is rewrite existing contracts. It can order one party to be responsible for the debt. It can include a “hold harmless” and “indemnify” provisions that require the spouse awarded the debt to pay back the other spouse if creditors of that debt come after them.
But at the end of the day, the contract signed when the parties were married is still intact. And a creditor can go after either party, regardless of what the divorce court.
This is important because there are usually two contracts in almost every marriage that can have a major financial impact on the parties: A mortgage and a vehicle loan. It’s also common to see HELOC loans. So, what can be done to protect the party who is not taking the house or the car?
Here are a few options:
The easiest way to remove names from loans is for the spouse who is keeping the home, vehicle, or other property on which the community has a loan. The biggest question is always—does the person who wants to keep qualify to refinance it. This needs to be known before a divorce agreement is made. The best thing to do is to have that person prequalify. If the prequalification is conditional, then those conditions need to be known and so the parties either negotiate to meet those conditions or abandon the idea of refinancing. As mentioned above, whenever parties agree to a refinancing, there should be a deadline for when it occurs and a consequence if it is not met (usually listing the home, vehicle, or other asset for sale).
Divorce has a tremendous impact on taxes from how you file to what you pay to who claims the child in what year. Here are some ways a divorce may impact your taxes:
Many people will need to rely on their spouse’s Social Security benefits in order to meet their needs in their old age. While Social Security is not divided in a divorce, a divorce will impact your ability to draw on your spouse’s Social Security. Here’s what you need to know about social security and divorce:
If you are on your spouse’s health insurance, your health insurance is going to be affected by divorce. During the divorce proceedings, your spouse will be prevented from removing you from their insurance under the Preliminary Injunction, a court order that, under Arizona law, goes immediately into effect when the Petitioner (aka the person who starts the divorce in the Court) files for divorce (It is binding on the Petitioner at the time of filing, and binding on the Respondent at the time of service).
But once divorced, health insurance is something you will be responsible for. Fortunately, federal and state laws offer a stepping-stone approach to people who have recently been divorced. Whether you qualify really depends on the status of your spouse’s employer.
The federal law, known as COBRA, requires employers of 20 or more employees to offer their employees and their families a temporary extension of health coverage (18 months) under certain circumstances, including divorce. The state law, known as mini-COBRA, extends the eligible businesses who must offer this insurance to a divorced spouse to include small businesses of less than twenty (20) employees who offer health insurance as a benefit. Here is what to know about this coverage:
*If you are not extended health insurance through one of the COBRA laws or if you want to consider a different plan, you should be aware that divorce is one of the “life-changing events” that allows a person to obtain insurance outside the Open Enrollment Period.
If you designated your spouse as a beneficiary of your life insurance policy and you are now divorcing your spouse, you may need to revisit your beneficiary designation on the life insurance.
In 1995, the Arizona state legislature adopted a revocation-upon-divorce law that, among other things, automatically revokes your spouse as the beneficiary of the life insurance policy at the time of divorce. So if your spouse has been the beneficiary, and you are getting divorced, you now have no beneficiary for your life insurance policy.
So once your divorce is final, one of the first things you should do is call your life insurance company and designate your beneficiary. It can be your ex-spouse or it can be someone else. This change should be made in writing. If you choose to keep your ex-spouse as a beneficiary, the revocation-upon-divorce law will not apply to your situation so long as you re-designated your spouse as the beneficiary after the divorce became final (that means you’ve received the Divorce Decree, signed by the judge, divorcing the two of you).
Be aware that this law does not apply to employer-provided life insurance policies. Those employer-provided benefits are governed by a federal law called ERISA, and it keeps the beneficiary you designate intact, regardless of whether you are divorced or married. This federal law overrides state law. If you have one of these plans, and you do not want your spouse to receive the proceeds, you must change the beneficiary. We recommend you contact your plan administrator ASAP to make that change.
Also be aware that in cases of spousal maintenance and child support, your spouse may require you to keep life insurance designating them as the beneficiary for the remaining amount owed for support. This is quite common. If it’s required of you, then, again, you should re-designate your spouse as the beneficiary once the divorce is finalized.
A divorce can affect the finances available for your child’s college education. Here’s what you need to know about how divorce might affect your child’s educational funding:
Arizona law does not require a parent pay for a child’s college education, but the parents can agree that they will pay for it. The duty to pay child support terminates either when the child turns 19 or when the child is 18 and graduates high school. Arizona law does not require a parent pay child support beyond that point, except if a child has severe disabilities.
But if you want such an agreement, an option is available to you—reach an agreement in writing with the other parent that they will fund the child’s education. If you make this agreement and put in the Divorce Decree, the Court will enforce it. *Be aware that to enforce it, you will need to file in civil court, not family court, to enforce that provision.
If a 529 savings plan was started during the marriage, it must be divided in the Divorce Decree. A 529 plan has many advantages for parents looking to save for their child’s education. But despite being for the child, the 529 actually belongs to the parents. That makes it a marital asset.
The 529 will need to be divided as part of the Decree. This is usually done by designating one parent as being in control of the account and including language within the decree requiring that parent to maintain the 529 savings plan for the benefit of the child.
If your spouse is named as a beneficiary in your will or trust, that is revoked upon divorce, although you can execute a new will renaming your spouse as a beneficiary in a will or a trust. For more information on this, see our tab on “Spouse as a Beneficiary.”
But how does divorce affect what you inherit? Divorce should not affect what you inherit. Inheritances are exempt from the community property laws in Arizona, so when it comes to your inheritance, it should not matter whether you are married or not.
However, Divorce can impact your inheritance, if you “commingle” your inheritance with community funds. Let’s say, for example, you inherited $10,000.00 from your grandmother and you put that money into the account where your money and your spouse’s paycheck goes, that $10,000 is going to be considered community property.
During a marriage, spouses commonly list each other as beneficiaries on various financial instruments, including wills, trusts, IRAs, 401(k)’s, etc. Upon a divorce, a law may or may not automatically change the beneficiary on these financial documents. Here’s how those various financial instruments are treated during a divorce:
Remember this is contingent on there being a divorce. If a spouse dies before the divorce is finalized, the beneficiary designations remain unchanged. If a couple is legally separated, the beneficiary designations remain unchanged.
Divorce and bankruptcy proceedings should not coincide with each other. Either wait to divorce until after the bankruptcy is complete or wait to file bankruptcy after the divorce is complete. Be aware that there are risks associated with both options and some debts cannot be discharged in a bankruptcy, including spousal maintenance, child support, and attorney’s fees owed from a child custody
For example, let’s say Spouse A and Spouse B owe $100,000.00 on a loan. If they file for bankruptcy together before the divorce, this debt can be discharged for both of them, but both of them also have a bankruptcy on their record.
So let’s say they opt to wait until after the divorce. The divorce court orders Spouse B to be solely responsible for the $100,000 debt. After the divorce, Spouse B files for bankruptcy, and the debt is discharged. What do the creditors do? They come after Spouse A for the full $100,000.00. They can do so even though the divorce court assigned the debt to Spouse B and the debt was discharged. This is because the Courts cannot change the terms of existing contracts.
*If you are considering a bankruptcy and a divorce, this is something that should be discussed with a bankruptcy attorney.
Someone may choose to quit a good job because their spouse got a promotion in a new city. A couple may decide one of them should stay home to raise the children. Someone else may forego pursuing a degree to support their spouse as they earn theirs. These are all choices that make sense as long as the couple stays together.
Then comes the divorce. And suddenly, one spouse is faced with a reality they had not prepared for—providing for themselves on their own. It can be challenging to transition back to the workforce and in some cases, it may not even be possible. That’s where spousal maintenance may come in. On the other side, being forced to pay spousal maintenance can feel unfair. Not only are they getting divorced, but now they must pay their spouse, even though their spouse is already getting a lot of the benefits and financial assets based on the overall division of property.
Arizona has tried to balance these two positions through creating a spousal maintenance system that allows dependent spouses to transition to their independence.
The law permits spousal maintenance (or alimony as it’s called in other states) for several reasons—to help maintain the lifestyle the parties enjoyed during the marriage, to account for the role a spouse’s took during the marriage (i.e., helping their spouse fulfill career ambitions by staying home to save on childcare costs), but the reason that is most likely to be reflected in a spousal maintenance order is to transition the receiving spouse to becoming self-sufficient.
Arizona law attempts to balance these interests. The state legislature has built numerous considerations into the spousal maintenance laws, and as of July 2023, there are finally Spousal Maintenance Guidelines and a calculation used for spousal maintenance awards outlined in ARS 25-319 Maintenance.
Before the court adopted the Self-Sufficiency Calculator, spousal maintenance was one of the most-litigated issues in a divorce. Even with the new guidelines, spousal maintenance is not automatic, and it is an extremely complex issue. The calculation has taken a once gray area and attempted to solidify the standards. If you think your divorce is one in which spousal maintenance may be an issue, we urge you to consult with an attorney to understand the rules.
Just because there is a new calculator available does not mean the lower or non-earning spouse is automatically eligible or entitled to spousal maintenance. In fact, the eligibility for spousal maintenance has not changed. A party requesting spousal maintenance must still meet at least one of the factors under A.R.S. § 25-319(A). See Ariz. Sp. M. Guidelines § 1(D) (affirming that A.R.S. § 25-319(A) controls eligibility). See id. (If a court determines that the requesting spouse is not eligible for spousal maintenance, there is no requirement to use the Spousal Maintenance Calculator). The calculator is not meant to be used to prove an award is warranted. Entitlement to a spousal maintenance award means that if a spouse is eligible and the calculator provides a figure and duration, the requesting spouse is entitled to the payments.
Once eligibility is determined, the new Guidelines require Courts to use the Spousal Maintenance Calculator and go through the below factors and steps to determine how much should be owed.
For spousal maintenance to be an issue, one of the spouses needs to request it in either the Petition or the Response to the Petition. If neither party requests it in one of those documents, it cannot be ordered.
The Affidavit of Financial Information (AFI) is a document that both parties need to fill out when spousal maintenance is at issue. It becomes a critical document in a spousal maintenance case where the focus is often on what the receiving spouse needs to meet their reasonable needs and whether the paying spouse can afford to pay spousal maintenance and meet their reasonable needs.
The other components of spousal maintenance include what the potential receiving spouse will be receiving in property from the divorce, what their earning capacity is in the market, whether they’ve reduced their opportunities for the benefit of the other spouse. On the other side, the Court will be interested in whether the potential paying spouse can afford to pay spousal maintenance. Discovery and disclosure help the parties get the information they need to make a risk assessment and determine whether they want to settle or go to trial.
In situations where a spouse has not worked for a while or has just started working, there is often a debate over what that spouse’s earning potential might be. A vocational evaluation is a meeting with an expert who is trained in determining what someone’s earning capacity is in the market. It is commonly ordered in these situations.
It is often advisable to try mediation once all the relevant information has been exchanged. The purpose of mediation is to see if the parties can reach an agreement that works for both people. Additionally, the parties can agree to make spousal maintenance non-modifiable; the Court on its own cannot order that.
If the parties cannot reach an agreement on spousal maintenance, the court must decide. The court can only decide after a trial.
Legal separation is almost identical to a divorce in every way except one: You are still married at the end of it.
Otherwise, the process and issues are the same: The community property needs to be separated, what happens with the children need to be decided, and the court must rule on whether one party is entitled to child or spousal support from the other party. The only difference is you are still married at the end of the proceedings.
Some people think that just because they are living apart, they are legally separated. That is not a legal separation. You are still married, and still accumulating marital property in the eyes of the law. A legal separation can only happen through the Courts.
As for separating the parties financially, legal separation is the strongest option for people who don’t want to live under community property laws but want to remain married. The reason why legal separation is stronger in this regard than a postnuptial agreement is because a postnuptial agreement is more easily set aside or overturned.
Both parties must agree to a legal separation. If either party wants to convert the legal separation into a divorce, they may do so. If at a later date the parties want to divorce they can begin that process.
If you are considering legal separation, here are some questions to consider:
Many employer benefits, including health insurance, are only available to an employee’s spouse and not to an ex-spouse. This is particularly true with health insurance. So legal separation is often used as a method to separate the parties while allowing one spouse to remain on the other’s spouse’s benefits. If this is your situation, you should speak with your employer’s human resources director to see how legal separation would affect spousal benefits.
Sometimes, a spouse begins to make reckless financial or personal decisions. Arizona is a community property state, so if your spouse gets sued, you are equally liable. But if you are legal separated, the community property laws, including those regarding liability, no longer apply.
Some people believe spouses should share finances; others believe spouses are better off keeping their finances separate. Legally separating removes spouses from the community property laws of the state. You should also be aware that post-nuptial and pre-nuptial agreements can accomplish the same, but those documents are subject to challenge at the time of divorce.
Some people do not believe in divorce, and a legal separation is a way for them to split without ending their marriage.
A legal separation is a smaller step to take than a divorce. A divorce has finality to it. While that is also true of legal separation when it comes to dividing up finances, the marriage remains intact. And it can be easier emotionally to say, “we’re separating” than it is to say, “we’re divorcing.”
A legal separation follows the same process of a divorce. There must be a Petition, Service, and a Response. If the two spouses come to an agreement, they can submit a Consent Decree to the Court for approval, just like a divorce.
Both parties must agree to a legal separation.
After a legal separation. If you decide after being legally separated to divorce, you can file for divorce by filing a Petition. It will need to be served. The focus will be strictly ending the marriage; however, if there are modifiable provisions (commonly, child custody, child support, and spousal maintenance) in the Legal Separation Decree, modification of those terms can be brought as part of the divorce action.
An annulment is a court order declaring that a marriage was never legally valid, effectively dissolving it from its inception. It is a “legal fiction,” meaning that although the marriage did occur in fact, the law treats it as though it never existed. An annulment may be granted when a marriage is either void (not legally permitted) or voidable (has a defect that makes it legally invalid). Despite this legal fiction, certain realities of the annulled marriage may continue to exist: the court may still divide community property acquired during the marriage, and under Hodges v. Hodges, if a recipient of spousal maintenance remarries, that right terminates upon remarriage and cannot be revived if the subsequent marriage is later annulled.
This process looks so easy on TV: You’ve been married a short while, realize you’ve made a mistake, get an annulment, and the next day, you’re no longer married.
Annulments don’t work like that in real life. There is so much misinformation surrounding annulments that the best way to explain is to dispel some of these myths:
Myth #1: If you have a marriage of short duration, you can get an annulment.
The truth: Annulments are only available when the marriage itself is
“void of voidable;” i.e., the marriage is defective. That means you have to have a reason for why the marriage was not valid in the first place.
Some common examples of grounds for an annulment are that one of the spouses was already married, one of the spouses was tricked into marrying the other spouse, one of the spouses lacked the mental capacity to marry, the parties did not intend to get married, one of the spouses was too young to marry, the spouses are first cousins under the age of 65, or one of the spouses refused to consummate the marriage.
Legally, the length of the marriage technically doesn’t matter, but realistically, it matters. Judges are more likely to annul a shorter marriage than a longer one. That means the longer you wait to start annulment proceedings, the less likely you are to be granted one.
Validity of marriage: If you have questions about whether you have a valid marriage, you should meet with an attorney. Briefly, here are a few principles regarding the validity of a marriage:
Myth #2: If you get your marriage annulled, there is no community property to be divided.
The truth: Property acquired by either spouse during a marriage is community proper. The annulment does not change that.
In accordance with A.R.S. § 25-302(B), Court must divide the property in the marital community as part of the annulment.
That’s not such a big deal if you’re annulling a marriage of couple months or even a year, but if you’re annulling a marriage of five years or more, it can be complicated.
Myth #3: You can get an annulment even if you just moved to Arizona.
The truth: An annulment has the same requirements as a divorce: At least one party must live in Arizona for 90 days prior to filing.
During a divorce, figuring out if something is community property or sole and separate property is typically pretty simple. However, some property can be hard to classify. The following questions can help determine if an asset is part of the marital community or owned solely by one spouse.
This is generally the key question for every piece of property. A basic tenet of community property law is that property acquires its status as community or separate at the time of its acquisition. Lawson v. Ridgeway, 72 Ariz. 253 (1951). The law in this regard is simple:
The “presumption” concept can introduce complexities into the analysis. This is a gray area because with only limited information, the analysis is not complete. Other factors might change whether the property is considered community or separate.
If the property in question was gifted or inherited, then it is not community property, even if it was acquired during the marriage. Such property can become community property if it is not kept separate from the other community property.
(Technically, the law says “by gift, devise, or descent,” but the only difference between the “devise or descent” is whether the property received was inherited through a will or not, so to simplify, the more familiar term “inherit” was used.)
Under A.R.S. § 25-214(C), either spouse may acquire, manage, control, or dispose of community property, except for certain transactions that require both spouses’ signatures to become community property. Most commonly, this occurs when a married couple finances a home in one spouse’s name alone. In that situation, the spouse who is not part of the mortgage may end up signing a disclaimer deed that forfeits their ownership interest in the house. But even though the house is owned by only one spouse, the other will still be entitled to some of the proceeds of the house through what is called a community lien. See Drahos Calculation.
The other, less common situations in A.R.S. § 25-214(C) that require both parties’ signatures to become community property include a guaranty, surety, or indemnity contract. For simplicity’s sake, think of a guarantor or surety as a co-signer. An agreement to indemnify is where a spouse promises to another person or entity: If you get sued, I will make you whole.
Commingling occurs when separate property and community property are mixed together. When funds become commingled, there is a presumption that the whole account is community property. For example, let’s say a wife inherits $20,000 from her aunt. When she receives the money, it is her sole and separate property. But she then deposits the inheritance into a joint account where her and her husband’s paychecks are deposited. At this point, the property is commingled and presumed to be community property.
Commingling cannot happen with real property. As the Arizona Court of Appeals wrote, “You cannot mix Black Acre with White Acre and obtain Gray Acre.” Potthoff v. Potthoff, 128 Ariz. 557, 562 (App. 1981). Separate real property remains separate so long as the other spouse’s name is not added to the deed.
The legal process of identifying separate property within commingled assets is called tracing. If the property can be traced, the property can remain separate. But when it becomes impossible to tell what part of the property is community and what part is separate, you cannot make a good-faith argument to trace portions of it.
Tracing can become impossible when there are hundreds or thousands of transactions to account for. Using the inheritance example from the previous question, after the wife deposits her $20,000 inheritance into their joint account, both she and her husband deposit their paychecks into that account, they pay their monthly bills from it, and they use it to pay for vacations, groceries, gas, etc. Between the time of the inheritance and the divorce, they may have hundreds, if not thousands, of transactions going in and out of that account. That makes it impossible to trace because you cannot identify what money went where. Since the inheritance was commingled, the entire account is considered community property.
In comparison, let’s say the wife deposited her $20,000 inheritance into a joint money market account with her husband. Then, they made three deposits of community funds totaling $6,000, and the husband made a withdrawal of $3,000. While there may be an argument over whether the husband was withdrawing the wife’s inherited funds or community funds, at the very least, we can trace out $17,000 of the wife’s inheritance as sole and separate property.
Prenuptial and postnuptial agreements can allow a married couple to decide whether something is community property or separate property. Arizona law allows spouses to opt out of the community property laws for part or all of their property through a prenuptial (before the marriage) or postnuptial agreement (during the marriage). As long as the Agreement itself is valid and not unconscionable, any property described in that Agreement will be divided in accordance with the Agreement.
During the divorce, couples can also decide how to classify their property with a Separation Agreement or Rule 69 Agreement.
A Property Settlement Agreement (PSA) in a divorce is a contract that divides a couple’s property, assets, and debts.
All couples getting a divorce must divide their property in accordance with A.R.S. § 25‑318 but using a Property Settlement Agreement (PSA) is not required. In divorces with limited community property, the parties often include the division of property within the Consent Decree itself. But in divorces with significant community property or if additional language to divide or protect assets is required, the Property Settlement Agreement is used to incorporate protective language to more clearly define the property division and the rights involved. PSAs give the parties (and their lawyers) an opportunity to detail the specifics of the property division; including the ability to more specifically identify the property being awarded, set deadlines for its division and/or sale, and add language that more fully protects the parties. The PSA includes schedules that assign specific assets and debts to each spouse.
A PSA contains four types of provisions:
Some other things to be aware of with PSAs:
The quickest timeline for a divorce is a little more than two months, and it requires both parties to be in agreement. That is because of a 60-day waiting period that is put in place under Arizona law. On this timeline, one spouse files the Petition for Dissolution, the paperwork that starts the divorce. Then they serve the other spouse (when things are amicable, this is done by giving your spouse the paperwork, and having them sign a notarized document that they received it, and this is then filed with the Court. That service date is important because it starts the sixty-day waiting period. At the end of the waiting period, the two of you can file your Consent Decree (and Parenting Plan, if you have children, and a Property Settlement Agreement, if appropriate). These are the documents that divorce you, contain your agreement, and divide your property and decide what happens with your child. Once the papers are signed by the judge, you are divorced.
If you want to stay in the house, you will need to get your spouse to agree to it, and you will need to buyout your spouse’s interest in the house. Unless a disclaimer deed has been signed, your spouse is entitled to half of the net equity in the home. To figure that out, you need to how much your home is worth and what is owed on the mortgage (in some cases, a home equity line of credit or a lien on the home may impact the net equity). For example, if your home is worth $400,000, and there’s $200,000 left on the mortgage, the net equity is $200,000, and you will need to pay your spouse $100,000 to buy out their interest. In most cases, you will need to show you are pre-qualified for a refinance. Most lenders can work with you to include the buyout as part of the refinance.
Before we can divide the marital property, we need to know what property is out there. The primary way we learn this is through disclosure and discovery. Under the rules of procedure, both parties are required to make extensive disclosures of their assets and debts. You can request additional information via discovery—a process that allows you to use different tools to find money. For example, if you believe your spouse is not forthcoming regarding their salary, you can subpoena their employer for their pay history. There are numerous discovery tools—depositions, subpoenas, interrogatories, requests for production, requests for admission, etc. You should speak with an attorney to learn your options regarding discovery and your duties under the disclosure rules.
Maybe, unless an exception applies, you are an owner of the business because it was started during the marriage. Under Arizona law, it does not matter whether your name is on the business because it was started during the marriage, it is part of of the community property and needs to be divided as part of the divorce proceeding. There are a few exceptions: Where the business was inherited or gifted to your spouse or where or a prenup or postnup is in place, then the business may not be community property.
You can get an annulment if you entered into a marriage that is either an illegal marriage or became voidable due to some defect in the marriage that occurred at the time of marriage. If you have only been married a short time and you realized you made a mistake, it may not be enough to get an annulment. The best way to figure out if you qualify is to meet with a divorce attorney.
Yes, you can stop a divorce at any time during the process if your spouse has not been served or has not filed a Response, and you were the filing party. But if the divorce has “officially” started, meaning, your spouse has been served or filed a Response, the two of you would have to agree to stop the divorce. If you and your spouse decide to stay married, the divorce case can be canceled or “dismissed” by filing a request with the Clerk of Superior Court and signed by both parties.
If your first divorce was never finalized, your second marriage is not legal. You will have to annul your second marriage and finalize the divorce from the first marriage before you can get re-married. Once the divorce is final, you can remarry your current spouse.
You must go through the Court to get divorced. But, when parties are in agreement, the paperwork can be drafted by an attorney who will file it once it is signed by the parties. In that case, the Court will still open and close a case, but neither party will have to set foot in the Courthouse.
But if you cannot come to an agreement regarding your divorce, a judge will have to make those decisions for you.
You are permitted to represent yourself in a divorce, but you are held to the same standard as an attorney. In other words, there is no excuse for not knowing the law or the rules. For that reason, if you do represent yourself, it may still be worthwhile to meet with an attorney and receive advice.
You may “need” an attorney if the other side has one. The rules and laws are complex, and people who represent themselves against an attorney are at a severe disadvantage. In contrast, if both parties are unrepresented, it is an even playing field; and, in that situation, hiring an attorney could give you an advantage.
It does not matter who files first or starts the divorce. One spouse must be the Petitioner and the other spouse must be the Respondent. There is no advantage or disadvantage to either (other than perhaps assignment of the courthouse nearest to the Petitioner).
We offer in-person, video, and phone consultations.